| The reason why the budgets turn
out to be such big disasters is that the finance ministers
simply have no leavers to control the economy. Everything
in India now depends on outsiders. The stock market
depends on foreign institutional investors who bring in or
send or take out their funds according to their own
convenience which has nothing to do with the state of
affairs in India. The foreign exchange market also depends
on outsiders, and how many dollars they bring or take out.
The current account deficit also depends on foreign
investors and nobody knows how they do their calculations. |
The rupee slumped to 46.75 against the dollar by the time you see
this in print. It will thus have lost four rupees to the dollar in
just six months, which speaks volumes for the way our economy is
being managed, if that is the right word. The finance minister who
is as much in the dark as anyone else about this sudden breakdown
in the economy has been going round asking everybody to be happy
and not to worry too much, for everything will be all right in the
end, as they say in films. This is what we have been hearing for
the last fifty years, but the end never seems to come and things
get worse every year.
So far the economic breakdown had affected only people like you
and me, that is, people outside the government, who make their
both ends meet in the private sector. This sector has been
affected very badly in the last few years. Jobs have vanished into
thin air, companies have folded, factories have closed down, and
millions of people thrown out on the streets.
But government people have had an easy time. They have been
getting their salaries on due dates and also their bonuses and
pensions. But now apparently, even they are in trouble and as
unsure of their cheque at the end of the month as anybody else.
In Maharashtra, government babus had to go without their bonus
this year because of some legal difficulties, if you believe the
chief minister. The real difficulty is that the government had no
money in the till. That was yesterday.
Today I read in the papers that the government has decided to
cut down babu salaries by ten per cent, which is a step in the
right direction, but one that the government may not be able to
take at all.
So Maharashtra, supposed to be the most affluent state of the
country, has also joined Bihar and up in the long list of states
who have become habitual defaulters. This is only the beginning.
I have a feeling that time will come when all states will be
defaulters, and ultimately they will also drag the Centre with
them. The Centre is already virtually bankrupt. Out of total
revenue receipts of Rs 204,000 crore in this year's budget,
interest payments account for Rs 101,000 crore, defence Rs 60,000
crore and staff salaries Rs 30,000 crore, making a total of Rs
191,000 crore. What does it leave the government? a bare Rs 13,000
crore, for everything else.
So it has to borrow money in the market, not just in the
country but also outside, to keep the pot boiling. It will borrow
Rs 112,000 crore this year, of which two-thirds have already been
raised, although the year is only halfway through. We are now
borrowing increasingly from friends in and outside the country,
including NRIs.
Last year, there was the excuse of Kargil. This time there is
no such excuse but even then it has come out with millennium
deposits, with the same purpose.
It's going to be a big racket, since the rupee is depreciating
rapidly, which means that you will receive an additional 5 per
cent on your deposits, over and above the very high interest rates
the government has announced. But you cannot go on raising cash
this way, for one day you will be told that nobody is prepared to
invest in government bonds. The chickens will then come home to
roost and the government will slip into real bankruptcy, as many
governments in Asia have done in recent years.
However, look at what is happening in countries like USA and
Britain. There they are discussing budget surpluses, not deficits.
USA will have a surplus of over 3 ,000 billion over the next ten
years, and the presidential aspirants are debating what they will
do with the money.
Bush says that he won't really need it and try and give most of
it back to tax payers whom it belongs. Gore says that he will use
it to reduce social security and medicare charges, which also
comes to the same thing.
Same thing is happening in Britain, though the quantities there
are rather small, because Britain is a much smaller economy. There
also the Tories and new Labour are debating what to do with the
extra cash. The Tories say that they would reduce tax rates, while
Tony Blair says that he will spread the largesse all round,
particularly among the low-income groups. How did they manage to
do this? Until a few years ago, they had budget deficits to deal
with. Their governments reduced tax rates but saw to it that the
economy was kept buoyant and total tax receipts were boosted. Even
then, their tax rates are much higher than ours.
Our problem is that we do not have longterm financial plans
focussing on budgets. We do not know the finance minister does not
know what his revenues are going to be or should be, how much the
expenditure and of course, the deficit.
All countries have long term budget plans, including USA, which
does not believe in planning, or says it does not believe, but
actually has a much more efficient planning programme than we
have. It was on the basis of this programme that they were able to
predict the volume of budget surpluses likely to arise over the
next ten years. They have ten-year plans which actually work. We
have five-year plans that never work. In fact, nobody in this
country knows how the economy is likely to function in the near or
even distant future.
At the time of this year's budget, there were all kinds of
forecasts, with the finance minister himself saying that GDP
growth would be 8 per cent during the year. Who told him this? His
economists? These are the same economists who have been wrong year
after year for the last so many years and who are really
responsible for the mess we are in. But it so happens that our
finance ministers rely on them at budget time and come up with
bogus figures like 8 per cent GDP growth and other similar
nonsense.
How is it that an economy that was supposed to end up with a
growth rate of 8 per cent will wind up with just 5 per cent?
Industrial growth will be even less than that, according to
present indications. This is going to be one of the worst years on
record, just like the year Chidambaram presented his disastrous
budget.
We seem to be proceeding from one disastrous budget to another,
though we are told all the time to be happy, and keep smiling. The
reason why the budgets turn out to be such big disasters is that
the finance ministers simply have no leavers to control the
economy. Everything in India now depends on outsiders.
The stock market depends on foreign institutional investors who
bring in or send or take out their funds according to their own
convenience which has nothing to do with the state of affairs in
India.
The foreign exchange market also depends on outsiders, and how
many dollars they bring or take out. The current account deficit
also depends on foreign investors and nobody knows how they do
their calculations. And what does the finance minister do? He
keeps running after all these outsiders, trying to humour them,
and asking them to be good boys and not to topple the apple cart.
He is not India's finance minister, but foreign investors' man in
India.
He is their man, not ours, and the economy too is theirs, not
ours. This is what globalisation really comes down to handing over
your economy to foreigners and hope for the best?.